“Equitable tolling may be appropriate where the defendant has
actively misled the plaintiff regarding her cause of action, where the
plaintiff has in some extraordinary way been prevented from asserting
her rights or where she has mistakenly asserted her rights in the wrong
forum.” Buckalew v. Ebi Companies, 2002 WL 1335110, at *4 (E.D. Pa, June
5 Plaintiff’s arrest occurred in March 1977. The documented activities
of the 5 Squad occurred three years later, during the period 1980
through 1984. See Sentencing Memorandum.
Philadelphia police engaged a long-standing pattern of appalling public corruption. The fact of this harm is readily ascertainable.
5 Squad: Philadelphia police engaged a long-standing pattern of appalling public corruption. The fact of this harm is readily ascertainable.
1 In deciding a motion for judgment on the pleadings under Rule 12(c), a court must “‘view the facts presented in the pleadings and the inferences to be drawn wherefrom in the light most favorable to the . . . non-moving party’” Green v. Fund Asset
Management, L.P., 245 F.3d 214, 220 (3d Cir. 2001), quoting Institute for Scientific Info, Inc. v. Gordon &; Breach, Science Publishers, Inc., 931 F.2d 1002, 1004 (3d Cir.1991).
Judgment is appropriate “only if the plaintiffs would not be entitled to relief under any set of facts that could be proved.” Id., citing Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Protlight, Inc., 188 F.3d 93, 95-96 (3d Cir. 1999).
BLANE NEELY a/k/a WALTER MITCHELL : CIVIL ACTION v SIX CONTINENT’S HOTELS, et. al. : No. 02-3890
ORDER-MEMORANDUM
AND NOW, this 15th day of October, 2003, the “Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings of Defendants, Six Continents Hotels, Inc., Holiday Inns, Inc. and John Sweetwood” is granted, Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c).1
This civil rights action arises from the March 1977 arrest and subsequent conviction and incarceration of plaintiff Blane Neely a/k/a Walter Mitchell. On March 17, 1977, plaintiff was a guest at the Holiday Inn in Philadelphia, where defendant Elliott Jurist was the night manager. Second Amended Complaint,
10, 11. At approximately 11 p.m., Jurist is alleged to have given defendant David Grove, a Philadelphia police officer, access to plaintiff’s telephone records and to have permitted him to listen in on plaintiff’s telephone conversations. Second Amended Complaint,
12. It is further alleged that later that night, Jurist and Grove entered plaintiff’s room and assaulted and robbed plaintiff. Second Amended Complaint,
13, 14. As a cover-up, plaintiff was then arrested, and subsequently convicted and incarcerated based on the testimony of Jurist and Grove.
2 Plaintiff pro se filed the original complaint and, on July 15, 2002, an amended complaint. On January 13, 2003, Cozen & O’Connor was appointed as counsel for plaintiff and immediately moved to amend the complaint. The motion was granted and on February 10, 2003, a Second Amended Complaint was filed.
3 “A claim may be dismissed as time-barred where it is clear from the complaint that the applicable statute of limitations has lapsed.” Buckalew v. Ebi Companies, 2002
WL 1335110, *1 (E.D. Pa., June 5, 2002) (citations omitted).
4 Molina v. City of Lancaster, 159 F. Supp.2d 813 (E.D. Pa. 2001). See also Bailey v. Tucker, 533 Pa. 237, 261, 621 A.2d 109, (1993)
(“it would seem that being subjected to a term of imprisonment is a harm or injury to the person. Nor can there be any doubt the fact of this harm is readily ascertainable upon its occurrence.”)
2
On June 25, 2002, plaintiff filed this civil rights action.2 On February 18, 2003, movants filed an answer to the second amended complaint, asserting a statute of limitations defense, and now move for judgment on the pleadings.
3
The parties agree that Pennsylvania’s two-year statute of limitations applies to federal claims arising under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1985(3) and 1986. In general, civil rights claims for false arrest and false imprisonment accrue at the time of the arrest and are timebarred if not commenced within two years of the arrest.4 Plaintiff was arrested in March 1977, and any civil rights claim based on the arrest was time-barred two years later. This case was not filed until 2002, 25 years after the arrest and well past the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations. Plaintiff contends, however, that the statute of limitations this case is tolled by the federal equitable tolling doctrine.
“Equitable tolling may be appropriate where the defendant has actively misled the plaintiff regarding her cause of action, where the plaintiff has in some extraordinary way been prevented from asserting her rights or where she has mistakenly asserted her rights in the wrong forum.” Buckalew v. Ebi Companies, 2002 WL 1335110, at *4 (E.D. Pa, June 5 Plaintiff’s arrest occurred in March 1977. The documented activities of the 5 Squad occurred three years later, during the period 1980 through 1984. See Sentencing Memorandum.
3
5, 2002), citing Lake v. Arnold, 232 F.3d 360, 370 n.9 (3d Cir. 2000); Oshiver v. Levin, Fishbein, Sedran & Berman, 38 F.3d 1380, 1387 (3d Cir. 1994). It is plaintiff’s burden to demonstrate the applicability of equitable tolling, and part of the burden is proving the exercise of reasonable diligence in pursuing the claim. Buckalew, supra, at *4 (citations omitted).
“Here, a period of 25 years elapsed between plaintiff’s arrest and his assertion of a federal civil rights violation. Plaintiff argues that he was prevented from asserting his rights “in an extraordinary way” because defendant Grove was a member of the 5 Squad, a group of Philadelphia police officers engaged in “a long-standing pattern of the most appalling public corruption.” United States v. Wilson, No. 88-282, Government Sentencing”
Memorandum, at p.2. However, plaintiff does not make out how the 5 Squad prevented him from proceeding with his claim. Also, there is no allegation that the 5 Squad was involved in plaintiff’s arrest.5 In addition to the 25-year delay between arrest and the filing of this claim, there was a 12-year delay after the sentencing of the 5 Squad in 1990.
Whatever influence or effect the 5 Squad may have had was dissipated upon the conviction and sentencing of its members.
“To invoke equitable tolling, [plaintiff] must show that [he] exercised reasonable diligence in investigating and bringing [his] claims.”
New Castle County v. Hallibur NUS Corp., 111 F.3d 1116, 1126 (3d Cir. 1997) (18-month delay in bringing CERCLA claim not excused by equitable tolling; complicated clean-up implementation procedures did not constitute extraordinary circumstances).
"One who fails to act diligently cannot invoke equitable principles to excuse that lack of diligence." Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown, 104 S. Ct. 1723, 1726 (1984)
(equitable tolling not invoked where pro se plaintiff ignored specific instructions regarding filing deadlines and filed employment discrimination action after 90-day period permitted by law).
Plaintiff does not attempt to explain the extraordinary delay in filing his claim. In that he has not satisfied his burden of proving diligence in the pursuit of his claim, equitable tolling cannot be sustained.
Plaintiff’s claims are time-barred.
BY THE COURT:
_______________________
Edmund V. Ludwig, J.
Labels: 5 Squad, hi daddy, Kryptonite, Political Corruption, TwitterVerses
IN THE UNITED STATES
DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT
OF PENNSYLVANIA
1 In deciding a motion for judgment on the pleadings under Rule 12(c), a court must “‘view the facts presented in the pleadings and the inferences to be drawn wherefrom in the light most favorable to the . . . non-moving party’” Green v. Fund Asset
Management, L.P., 245 F.3d 214, 220 (3d Cir. 2001), quoting Institute for Scientific Info, Inc. v. Gordon &; Breach, Science Publishers, Inc., 931 F.2d 1002, 1004 (3d Cir.1991).
Judgment is appropriate “only if the plaintiffs would not be entitled to relief under any set of facts that could be proved.” Id., citing Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Protlight, Inc., 188 F.3d 93, 95-96 (3d Cir. 1999).
BLANE NEELY a/k/a WALTER MITCHELL : CIVIL ACTION v SIX CONTINENT’S HOTELS, et. al. : No. 02-3890
ORDER-MEMORANDUM
AND NOW, this 15th day of October, 2003, the “Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings of Defendants, Six Continents Hotels, Inc., Holiday Inns, Inc. and John Sweetwood” is granted, Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c).1
This civil rights action arises from the March 1977 arrest and subsequent conviction and incarceration of plaintiff Blane Neely a/k/a Walter Mitchell. On March 17, 1977, plaintiff was a guest at the Holiday Inn in Philadelphia, where defendant Elliott Jurist was the night manager. Second Amended Complaint,
10, 11. At approximately 11 p.m., Jurist is alleged to have given defendant David Grove, a Philadelphia police officer, access to plaintiff’s telephone records and to have permitted him to listen in on plaintiff’s telephone conversations. Second Amended Complaint,
12. It is further alleged that later that night, Jurist and Grove entered plaintiff’s room and assaulted and robbed plaintiff. Second Amended Complaint,
13, 14. As a cover-up, plaintiff was then arrested, and subsequently convicted and incarcerated based on the testimony of Jurist and Grove.
2 Plaintiff pro se filed the original complaint and, on July 15, 2002, an amended complaint. On January 13, 2003, Cozen & O’Connor was appointed as counsel for plaintiff and immediately moved to amend the complaint. The motion was granted and on February 10, 2003, a Second Amended Complaint was filed.
3 “A claim may be dismissed as time-barred where it is clear from the complaint that the applicable statute of limitations has lapsed.” Buckalew v. Ebi Companies, 2002
WL 1335110, *1 (E.D. Pa., June 5, 2002) (citations omitted).
4 Molina v. City of Lancaster, 159 F. Supp.2d 813 (E.D. Pa. 2001). See also Bailey v. Tucker, 533 Pa. 237, 261, 621 A.2d 109, (1993)
(“it would seem that being subjected to a term of imprisonment is a harm or injury to the person. Nor can there be any doubt the fact of this harm is readily ascertainable upon its occurrence.”)
2
On June 25, 2002, plaintiff filed this civil rights action.2 On February 18, 2003, movants filed an answer to the second amended complaint, asserting a statute of limitations defense, and now move for judgment on the pleadings.
3
The parties agree that Pennsylvania’s two-year statute of limitations applies to federal claims arising under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1985(3) and 1986. In general, civil rights claims for false arrest and false imprisonment accrue at the time of the arrest and are timebarred if not commenced within two years of the arrest.4 Plaintiff was arrested in March 1977, and any civil rights claim based on the arrest was time-barred two years later. This case was not filed until 2002, 25 years after the arrest and well past the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations. Plaintiff contends, however, that the statute of limitations this case is tolled by the federal equitable tolling doctrine.
“Equitable tolling may be appropriate where the defendant has actively misled the plaintiff regarding her cause of action, where the plaintiff has in some extraordinary way been prevented from asserting her rights or where she has mistakenly asserted her rights in the wrong forum.” Buckalew v. Ebi Companies, 2002 WL 1335110, at *4 (E.D. Pa, June 5 Plaintiff’s arrest occurred in March 1977. The documented activities of the 5 Squad occurred three years later, during the period 1980 through 1984. See Sentencing Memorandum.
3
5, 2002), citing Lake v. Arnold, 232 F.3d 360, 370 n.9 (3d Cir. 2000); Oshiver v. Levin, Fishbein, Sedran & Berman, 38 F.3d 1380, 1387 (3d Cir. 1994). It is plaintiff’s burden to demonstrate the applicability of equitable tolling, and part of the burden is proving the exercise of reasonable diligence in pursuing the claim. Buckalew, supra, at *4 (citations omitted).
Here, a period of 25 years elapsed between plaintiff’s arrest and his assertion of a federal civil rights violation. Plaintiff argues that he was prevented from asserting his rights “in an extraordinary way” because defendant Grove was a member of the 5 Squad, a group of Philadelphia police officers engaged in “a long-standing pattern of the most appalling public corruption.” United States v. Wilson, No. 88-282, Government Sentencing
Memorandum, at p.2. However, plaintiff does not make out how the 5 Squad prevented him from proceeding with his claim. Also, there is no allegation that the 5 Squad was involved in plaintiff’s arrest.5 In addition to the 25-year delay between arrest and the filing of this claim, there was a 12-year delay after the sentencing of the 5 Squad in 1990.
Whatever influence or effect the 5 Squad may have had was dissipated upon the conviction and sentencing of its members.
“To invoke equitable tolling, [plaintiff] must show that [he] exercised reasonable diligence in investigating and bringing [his] claims.”
New Castle County v. Hallibur NUS Corp., 111 F.3d 1116, 1126 (3d Cir. 1997) (18-month delay in bringing CERCLA claim not excused by equitable tolling; complicated clean-up implementation procedures did not constitute extraordinary circumstances).
"One who fails to act diligently cannot invoke equitable principles to excuse that lack of diligence." Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown, 104 S. Ct. 1723, 1726 (1984)
(equitable tolling not invoked where pro se plaintiff ignored specific instructions regarding filing deadlines and filed employment discrimination action after 90-day period permitted by law).
Plaintiff does not attempt to explain the extraordinary delay in filing his claim. In that he has not satisfied his burden of proving diligence in the pursuit of his claim, equitable tolling cannot be sustained.
Plaintiff’s claims are time-barred.
BY THE COURT:
_______________________
Edmund V. Ludwig, J.
Labels: 5 Squad, hi daddy, Kryptonite, Political Corruption, TwitterVerses
via feedproxy.google.com
yeah... i think you wannna see this...
Posted via web from ElyssaD's Posterous
Posted by Elyssa D'Educrat
Labels: #Armstrong, #CFTC, #Drexel, #Madoff, #Mumia #fuckyourightback, #SEC, fraud, political corruption, whitecollar at Sunday, March 07, 2010
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Links to this post
Create a Link
Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom) Elyssa D'Educrat's shared items
The Difference Between Internet Explorer, Firefox,...
from Web Browsers News and Reviews
Unemployment tops 20% in eight California counties
from latimes.com
Taking On China
from NYT > China
brownpau: everytime you make a powerpoint edward tufte...
from I Love Charts
Reform Requires Regulation
from Elyssa Durant
The Cost & Prevaleance of Chronic Conditions in the...
from Elyssa Durant
Chief justice unsettled by Obama's criticism of Supreme...
from latimes.com
EFF knocks iPhone developer license agreement
from CNET NewsView all »
@ElyssaD
ELYSSA DURANT
Elyssa Durant
A little bit of everything... mostly free range ranting. If first thought is best thought, let this be my playground. I hope to focus on content rather than perfection.
View my complete profile
Sanity for Superheroes
powered by
Blog Archive
▼ 2010 (60)
▼ March (60)
CASSINGLE? 45? ALL I KNOW IS IT ONE WIDGET!
Mayor's Office of the Ten-Year Plan to End Chronic...
Blue Cross CEOs gorge on profits from premiums
K...
Introducing News Dots - By Chris Wilson - Slate Ma...
Nashville Mayor Karl Dean makes a deal with the Ch...
OpEdNews - Article: THE OFFICE THAT SPIED ON ITS O...
Article: Needed; Editors, Awakeners, Putting-the-p...
Article: AIG, Goldman Sachs,the Fed and Treasury, ...
Article: Economic Warfare? Europe versus Wall Str...
Article: To what extent are rigged bond auctions b...
Under Pressure: Evolution or e-volution...
Friends of Peltier: UN Expert to Report on Afforda...
Elyssa D' Educrat has shared items with you throug...
Untitled
dots...
Former guard sentenced in deadly bar shooting
Na...
The Wealthiest Towns in America: Belle Meade, Tenn...
MEDIA ALERT: Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) ...
First they Came for the Jews...
Metro Nashville Council looks to silence Twitter a...
Charges dismissed against reformed-mob-boss-turned...
Judge Holds Merck Liable - Wall Street Journal
Who needs political consultants when journalists c...
A west Tennessee journalist disgusted by bizpig jo...
Metro Council passes convention center plan; gener...
Earnings Report: HealthSpring soars from Medicare ...
CHS wrongly wiggled out of contract, Managed Care ...
Survey: 40 percent in U.S. have no broadband
WiMax deployments ramp globally, but U.S. lags
Metro Nashville schools to target bus drivers, jan...
Top Ten Tips for Livin Laid-Off: #10! [video]
Odd Todd: Eyeball Hypochondria
Topsy Labs » Blog Archive » Topsy Update – Photo S...
Building a Better Teacher
U.S. Hopes Internet Exports Will Help Open Closed ...
Topsy Labs
TN stimulus funds give students greater access to ...
Nashville schools offer Vanderbilt degrees for top...
The Associated Press: Australian court: Vioxx doub...
Judge Holds Merck Liable - Wall Street Journal
COINTELPRO The Naked Truth
Metro Nashville schools to target bus drivers, jan...
5 Squad: Philadelphia police engaged a long-standi...
Lessons I've learned in 5 years of working with MD...
Next steps for stimulus
Metro Nashville - General Services - ADA Complianc...
Twitter / Kevin Eder: RE http://bit.ly/bziYUp Ar ....
Twitter / LML: exactly. RT @ElyssaD: @lml ...
OpEdNews - Quicklink: The Fleecing of America: Tho...
OpEdNews - Article: THE IRANIAN PEOPLE'S STRUGGLE ...
OpEdNews - Article: 1-2-3 What Are We Fighting For...
OpEdNews - Article: Michael Moore: There's Going t...
OpEdNews - Article: Mainstream Media FAIL with Ove...
Social Media Use Among Teens, Boomers and Moms: Ne...
OpEdNews - Article: The 'Mumia Exception' - Explai...
OpEdNews - Article: The 'Mumia Exception' - Explai...
COINTELPRO: THE NAKED TRUTH FBI Domestic Intellig...
Nashville,TN: Social Serivces Uses Federal Funds t...
Nashville,TN: Social Serivces Uses Federal Funds t...
Reality Bytes: Writing Through Dark
► 2009 (2)
► October (1)
► March (1)
► 2008 (7)
► December (2)
► November (2)
► October (3)
Daylife Custom Feed
Elyssa Durant: Older & Bolder
i'm done watching this
Yet, in the midst of it all, I just received a letter dated January 2, 2008 along with approximately 370,000. Coincidentally—this is roughly the same number of TennCare recipients who were dropped from the rolls (dis-enrolled due to reform) just a few years ago]] people that my personal information (including my social security number) has been compromised due to a break-in at the Davidson County Election Commission on Christmas Eve in Nashville, Tennessee.
